June 29, 2012

Birthday and my cat

My birthday was a couple of days ago. My cake was a crepe cake, meaning that it was made from crepes glued together with a cream filling. It was very good, however I was the one to make over 20 crepes for it.
The cake, look at the layers.
For candles my mom got the great idea to put sparklers on the cake. The cake was still in the house when this happened.
Me and the sparklers, taken with Mom's iPad
Thankfully none of the smoke detectors went off, even when there was smoke throughout the entire house. The smoke was very noticeable when it was by the lights, then Dad turned on the stove fan (sucked the smoke away). There was also a heavy smell of gunpowder, it was interesting.

My cat has been spending more time in my room after I tried to cat proof my yarn, she has now decided that her favorite spot is for my to be laying down and her on my chest and stomach.

She also purrs until she drools on me, which is rather gross. Of course the rest of the time she is just as demanding as ever.

For my knitting, since I finished the baby blanket I have been working on a baby sweater. Little Hanten
The blanket was given to the recipient at a baby shower that was kept a secret from her very successfully. She liked the blanket and the rest of the gifts that she was given.







More on the baby sweater and other parts of life will be out later.

I will leave you with this:

June 20, 2012

Olympics, the USOC and knitters

For those who do not already know, the USOC (US Olympics Committee) has sent a Cease & Desist letter to Ravelry. The letter was sent because Ravelry plays host to a group of knitter who organize an event called the Ravelympics. The Ravelympics occur during the Olympic Games, and are generally meant to be participated in while watching the events. Ravelry makes no money from this group, there is no competition unless one counts against the time limits of the Olympics. The letter wants the name of the Ravelympics to be changed to something else to protect the trademark that the USOC holds on the Olympics. The issue of the name change is not what is making the members of Ravelry so mad, what is is the assertion that crafting is disrespectful to the athletes. I have reproduced the entire letter as I was shown it by the founder of Ravelry who was sent it.

Dear Mr. Forbes,
In March 14, 2011, my colleague, Carol Gross, corresponded with your attorney, Craig Selmach [sic], in regard to a pin listed as the “2010 Ravelympic Badge of Glory.”  At that time, she explained that the use of RAVELYMPIC infringed upon the USOC’s intellectual property rights, and you kindly removed the pin from the website.  I was hoping to close our file on this matter, but upon further review of your website, I found more infringing content.
By way of review, the USOC is a non-profit corporation chartered by Congress to coordinate, promote and govern all international amateur athletic activities in the United States.  The USOC therefore is responsible for training, entering and underwriting U.S. Teams in the Olympic Games.  Unlike the National Olympic Committees of many other countries, the USOC does not rely on federal funding to support all of its efforts.  Therefore, in order to fulfill our responsibilities without the need for federal funding, Congress granted the USOC the exclusive right to use and control the commercial use of the word OLYMPIC a and any simulation or combination thereof in the United States, as well as the OLYMPIC SYMBOL.  See the Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, 36 U.S.C. §220501 et seq. (the “Act”).  (A copy of the relevant portion of the Act is enclosed for your convenience.)  The Act prohibits the unauthorized use of the Olympic Symbol or the mark OLYMPIC and derivations thereof for any commercial purpose or for any competition, such as the one organized through your website.  See 36 U.S.C. §220506(c).  The USOC primarily relies on legitimate sponsorship fees and licensing revenues to support U.S. Olympic athletes and finance this country’s participation in the Olympic Games.  Other companies, like Nike and Ralph Lauren, have paid substantial sums for the right to use Olympic-related marks, and through their sponsorships support the U.S. Olympic Team.  Therefore, it is important that we restrict the use of Olympic marks and protect the rights of companies who financially support Team USA.
In addition to the protections of the Act discussed above, the USOC also owns numerous trademark registration that include the mark OLYMPIC. These marks therefore are protected under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1051 et seq. Thus, Ravelry.com’s unauthorized use of the mark OLYMPIC or derivations thereof, such as RAVELYMPICS, may constitute trademark infringement, unfair competition and dilution of our famous trademarks.
The USOC would like to settle this matter on an amicable basis. However, we must request the following actions be taken.
1.  Changing the name of the event, the “Ravelympics.”;  The athletes of Team USA have usually spent the better part of their entire lives training for the opportunity to compete at the Olympic Games and represent their country in a sport that means everything to them.  For many, the Olympics represent the pinnacle of their sporting career.  Over more than a century, the Olympic Games have brought athletes around the world together to compete in an event that has come to mean much more than just a competition between the world’s best athletes.  The Olympic Games represent ideals that go beyond sport to encompass culture and education, tolerance and respect, world peace and harmony.
The USOC is responsible for preserving the Olympic Movement and its ideals within the United States.  Part of that responsibility is to ensure that Olympic trademarks, imagery and terminology are protected and given the appropriate respect.  We believe using the name “Ravelympics” for a competition that involves an afghan marathon, scarf hockey and sweater triathlon, among others, tends to denigrate the true nature of the Olympic Games.  In a sense, it is disrespectful to our country’s finest athletes and fails to recognize or appreciate their hard work.
It looks as if this is the third time that the Ravelympics have been organized, each coinciding with an Olympic year (2008, 2010, and 2012).  The name Ravelympics is clearly derived from the terms “Ravelry” (the name of your website) and OLYMPICS, making RAVELYMPICS a simulation of the mark OLYMPIC tending to falsely suggest a connection to the Olympic Movement.  Thus, the use of RAVELYMPICS is prohibited by the Act.  Knowing this, we are sure that you can appreciate the need for you to re-name the event, to something like the Ravelry Games.
1.  Removal of Olympic Symbols in patterns, projects, etc.   As stated before, the USOC receives no funding from the government to support this country’s Olympic athletes.  The USOC relies upon official licensing and sponsorship fees to raise the funds necessary to fulfill its mission. Therefore, the USOC reserves use of Olympic terminology and trademarks to our official sponsors, suppliers and licensees.  The patterns and projects featuring the Olympic Symbol on Ravelry.com’s website are not licensed and therefore unauthorized.  The USOC respectfully asks that all such patterns and projects be removed from your site.
For your convenience, we have listed some of the patterns featuring Olympic trademarks.  However, this list should be viewed as illustrative rather than exhaustive.  The USOC requests that all patterns involving Olympic trademarks be removed from the website.  We further request that  you rename various patterns that may not feature Olympic trademarks in the design but improperly use Olympic in the pattern name.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.  We would appreciate a written reply to this letter by no later than June 19, 2012.  If you would like to discuss this matter directly, please feel free to contact me at the number above, or you may reach my colleague, Carol Gross.
Kindest Regards,
Brett Hirsch
Law Clerk
Office of the General Counsel
United States Olympic Committee
1 Olympic Plaza
Colorado Springs, CO 80909

You will note that the language used to say that the act of knitting, crocheting, spinning, weaving or other craft during the Olympics in this form is disrespectful includes the use of the word 'denigrate'. Denigrate means to criticize unfairly; disparage. Does the use of this word mean that all those people who are using the time it takes to watch these events on the tv are horrible people who hate athletics, if that was the case why would we be organizing, planning, spending money and time preparing for the Olympics and the Ravelympics.


Again, this is not about the trademark/copyright issues, this is about the language the used to refer to people who knit, crochet, etc.